[YG Conlang Archives] > [engelang group] > messages [Date Index] [Thread Index] >
On Wed, Sep 5, 2012 at 4:43 PM, And Rosta <and.rosta@hidden.email> wrote: > > Would it make sense to have instead of the operator "ju", a binary > counterpart of "fV"? E.g. "hV"? "hV" would be equivalent to "fV ju", right? Instead of "ju" you would need something like "lV smV hV". And instead of "ju F1 ju F2 F3", we would have "lV smV hV F1 hV F2 F3"? That's assuming that a state of affairs in which F occurs is equivalent to a state of affairs, in which a state of affairs in which F occurs, occurs. mu'o mi'e xorxes