[YG Conlang Archives] > [Latejami group] > messages [Date Index] [Thread Index] >


[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

Re: [Ladekwa] Changes to Ladekwa



The valency (the argument structure needed) by a word, and if it forms a sentence or not, are the pieces of information needed to work with the words in the dictionary.
In fact, you often advise explicitly that a word is a verb and not an adjective.
Regards,
Stephan
----- Original Message -----
To: Ladekwa@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Wednesday, September 28, 2005 4:30 PM
Subject: Re: [Ladekwa] Changes to Ladekwa

"Stephan Schneider" <sts@hidden.email> wrote:
>
> In a dictionary, the information if something is a verb, a noun, a
> prefix a= nd so on, is given. Anyway, I wouldn't need that kind of
> information _now_,= as I have understood the difference between kyu
> and gyu, for example.
>
The classifier or suffix always indicates the part-of-speech.  There is
no need to list it separately.  This dictionary is intended for people
who will be working closely with the language.  It is not intended for
casual browsers.

Still, it wouldn't be too difficult to add it.  Does anyone else have an
opinion?  Also, what abbreviations should I use for them?  Ladekwa has
parts-of-speech that natural languages do not have.

>
> Boyvica lujazopumbomi vyukoy jikay.
>
I think you mean "bovica" for the verb root.  You also have to focus it,
because activities are unfocused by default.  Thus, you want to use
"bovicanzi".

  Bovicanzi lujazopumbomi vyukoy jikay.
  = "WINNERS hand-write the history".

However, I would prefer:

  Vicanzi lujazopumbomi vyukoy jikay.
  = "WINNERS write the history".


Regards,

Rick Morneau
http://www.eskimo.com/~ram