[YG Conlang Archives] > [westasianconlangs group] > messages [Date Index] [Thread Index] >
Steg Belsky wrote: > I think /./ here means 'retroflex', not 'emphatic', so this is just the > standard Urdu way of doing it (which confused me to know end the first > few times i saw it). Now I see. If they are retroflex, then indeed we can offer Urdu-like rendering: /t`/ - tteh U+0679 /d`/ - ddal U+0688 /n`/ - rnoon U+06BB. But there is no siin with t.a superposed attested in Arabic scripts! I'd offer seen with three dots below U+069B. No rreh /r`/ U+0691, Theophilus, eh? -- Yitzik