[YG Conlang Archives] > [romconlang group] > messages [Date Index] [Thread Index] >
On 12 Aug 2009, at 14:04, Benct Philip Jonsson wrote:
I rather think palatalization and voicing of /s/, in whatever order, was involved, since else it is a puzzle why [oh] or [o:] would have become [oi]. The real puzzle is why palatalization was limited to /s/ or /z/ in final position.
I'm willing to buy it. :) But my question would be, though: What caused palatalization<->voicing of the /s/?
Cheers, Carl -- Carl Edlund Anderson http://www.carlaz.com/