[YG Conlang Archives] > [romconlang group] > messages [Date Index] [Thread Index] >


[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

Palatalization in Alternative Romance



The issue of relative chronology of Romance sound changes got me
thinking of the issue of palatalization, which was very early in
Romance, occurring everywhere except in Sard and rearing its head in
inscriptions perhaps already in early imperial times. How does one
deal with that when making a bastardlang of Romance and a
non-palatalizing language like High German, Old Norse, Britonic or
Semitic? One may set a Point of Divergence so early that
palatalization hadn't occurred, which means a BC POD, like Thrjótrun,
or pushing palatalization forwards to be as late as it could possibly
be, and setting ones POD late but not so late that palatalization had
occurred or it was still at the /c/ stage and imperceptible to
substrate speakers, or one can bastardize the other way around and
introduce it into the bastard contra the substrate, as Brithenig and
Bâzrâmani, and it might be a Good thing, when the substrate language
has palatal sounds.

So I got this idea how palatalization may be a Good Thing in a
non-Anglo Germano-Romance lang: it may be a source of /T/ and it need
not take 1500 years as in Castilian! According to some Old French had
already reached a stage where the reflex of C' and TJ was a laminal
[s_m] while the reflex of S was an apical [s_a]. Now we know that in
modern Icelandic "/T/" is a laminal alveolar and /s/ is an apical
alveolar. Imagine a Vulgar Latin dialect with such a distinction
underlying a Germano-Romance bastard! You'd get CISTA > Dist/ Thist,
VITIA > Wide, and GERMANIA > Jermeine! The snag is that in twelfth
century French C' was probably still [ts], though certainly laminal,
so that the idea might still work if one is prepared to believe that
Germanic substrate speakers heard a laminal [ts_m] as their /T/. One
would still get /ke/ from QUE and /kve/ from QUA with umlaut! The big
advantage is that you get to have a late separation from
Gallo-Romance, practically coinciding with the consonant shift. The
disadvantage of course is that OTL German doesn't show palatalization
in Latin loans.

/BP

-- 
/ BP