Re: [romconlang] Paternoschter

From: Adam Walker <carrajena@hidden.email>
Date: Wed, 28 Nov 2007 15:46:07 -0800 (PST)
Subject: Re: [romconlang] Paternoschter
To: romconlang@yahoogroups.com

--- Peter Collier and Benct wrote:
> > the meanings 'this' and 'that' are taken over by
> > ECCE ISTE
> > or ECCU ISTE and ECCE ILLE or ECCU ILLE, e.g.
> French
> > ce (ces
> > in Old French) and cel, Italian questo, quello.
> 
> I used ECCE ISTE etc - can't remember off hand what
> it
> came to as I don't have my notes here, but something
> like keischte? It began /k/[V] anyway. 

I used QUI ISTUD/ISTA/ISTE in C-a which, IIRC, yielded
fistu/a/i for this.  "That" derives from IPSUM/A/E and
gives isu/a/i.

Adam

Ed ï¿½avisud in junu suï¿½u pera nun regrediri ad ul Erodu, regrediruns ad il sustrus provinchi peu'l via aurra.

Machu 2:12

References:
- Re: [romconlang] Paternoschter
  - From: Peter Collier <petecollier@hidden.email>

Prev by Date: Re: [romconlang] past particple
Next by Date: Verner & Paternoster II (was: past particple)
Previous by thread: Re: [romconlang] Paternoschter
Next by thread: Re: [romconlang] past particple
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread