[YG Conlang Archives] > [romconlang group] > messages [Date Index] [Thread Index] >
--- Benct Philip Jonsson wrote: > I'm of course biassed by the fact that the Rhodrese > equivalent would be _sulonc_ or _saulonc_ (may I > steal it?* :-) Feel free; I don't care for using a form derived from secundum either. I can't put my finger on it, but I just like something like sulunque better. > but either _sulunque_ or _sulonque_ looks good. > _Sulunque_ may have the added attraction for > your purposes that it falsely suggests UNQUE! :-) Agreed! Sulunque it is! Cheers, Eamon