[YG Conlang Archives] > [romconlang group] > messages [Date Index] [Thread Index] >
Thank you for your answers. You're all right! I maybe sounded you having auxlanger or even non-conlanger arguments... I think it's because the auxlangs were the first languages I looked after. I found it interesting to simplify languages like that. But then I was disappointed because I found there was no "design" in them as you said. Then I discovered artlangs, which I found "designed" but I failed in learning them. This double disappointment made me in the trouble with conlangs. As somebody said I had even non-conlanger arguments, like the "utility" of a conlang... but that's not me! That's what people told me when they saw my conlang! I love artlangs, I don't want to go to the "Auxlangs" group... ;-) In fact, I've got a different vision of conlangs when I "make" them than when I "watch" the one of the others. I'm quite lazy, I don't like spending much time in reading the other's grammar, but when I make a conlang I like making it look like "me" and I don't like making a too rigid grammar. That's an artlanger vision! About the fact of "making" people learning my language, my old dream is to discuss with loved ones in a conlang I created not to be understood by other people in public. But it's just a dream, I don't know anybody who likes conlanging in the real life... Maybe one day!!