[YG Conlang Archives] > [romconlang group] > messages [Date Index] [Thread Index] >
Jacques Dehée skrev: > I mean a successful romance conlang, not a cryptogram ! > > Cheers, Jacques May sutxes nones el medeis paull <<linguist ausciliar>> ed el <<artist linguístec>>! No crair che ancaure une lenghe cinstrutxe ausciliar -- enquant txi son melt! -- poudet escaulir algun bisegn che il gint romá puoden tiendre a comunichiar entre se. Sutxes paur me es estxitiar el sens estétec de mestes ed eltre artist linguístic, che es almen un scop atenaul! Jo no affront ausciliarist paur doniar nem mel a seu criacéú. Senó nau entresset restuam en silenç e lasçuam li fiar suë cause senç judiç de valaur. /Bendetx But success is not the same for the auxlanger and the artlanger! I don't think that another constructed auxlang -- of which there are many! -- can satisfy any need which the Roman peoples may have to communicate with each other. Success for me is to excite the aesthetic sense of myself and other artlangers, which is at least an attainable goal! I don't affront auxlangers by giving their creations bad names. If I'm not interested I rest in silence and let them do their thing without value judgements. /Benct