[YG Conlang Archives] > [romconlang group] > messages [Date Index] [Thread Index] >


[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

Re: Carraxan Easter -- day 5



--- In romconlang@yahoogroups.com, Adam Walker <carrajena@y...> wrote:
> 
> --- Padraic Brown <elemtilas@y...> wrote:
> 
> > 
> > --- Adam Walker <carrajena@y...> wrote:
> > 
> > > --- Padraic Brown <elemtilas@y...> wrote:
> > > > 
> > > > --- Adam Walker <carrajena@y...> wrote:
> > > >  
> > > > > This is the only day of the year when
> > > Eucharist
> > > > > is
> > > > > taken in the home and included as part of a
> > > > > meal. 
> > > > > Otherwise it is a rite performed in the
> > > > > churches by
> > > > > the clergy and administered to the
> > > faithful. 
> > > > > Each
> > > > > family tends to have a certain Gospel which
> > > is
> > > > > tradition within that family to read/recite
> > > > > from on this night. 
> > > > 
> > > > But doesn't a (qualified and spiritually
> > > whole)
> > > > priest still have to consecrate the bread in
> > > > advance? Or is the father allowed to do this
> > > once
> > > > a year?
> > > > 
> > > 
> > > You're probably right.  In my church background
> > > any
> > > individual believer can bless the bread and
> > > wine, in
> > > fact, at many of the communion services I have
> > > participated in each believer consecrates his
> > > or her
> > > own elements.  I'll have to formulate a
> > > Donatist
> > > doctrine to resolve this question.  Can the
> > > father be
> > > considered the priest of the household for the
> > > purpose of this most holy communion?  
> > 
> > Unless they've diverged considerably from the
> > Catholic-Orthodox tradition they originally came
> > from, the answer would be emphatically "no".
> > 
> 
> Except that the tradition under discussion only began
> to emerge with Cyprian who wrote only a few years
> before the split took place.  His ideas weren't firmly
> established in any tradition by the time the Donatists
> parted ways with Rome.  I'm thinking that the
> independant spirit of the Berber Donatists might have
> encouraged some different views from those espoused by
> the thoroughly Latinized city folk like Cyprian.  And
> they would have Scriptural support for such
> divergences, especially in I Pt. 2.
> 
> 
> > > Since he will already be
> > > performing some other priestly duties in simply
> > > distributing the elements and reading the
> > > Scripture.
> > 
> > Some of these can be and are (*here*) delegated.
> > Communion, in Catholic churches, is regularly
> > distributed by specially authorised lay
> > ministers. The gospel and sermons can be
> > proclaimed by deacons, if authorised by the
> > presiding priest.
> >  
> 
> But isn't that a recent development (post Vatican II?)
> in the Catholic Church?
> 
> > > And what about a widow, would she be permited
> > > as well?
> > 
> > To say nothing of a woman, though early on I
> > understand there wère female priests.
> > 
> 
> Yes, and the practice wasn't stamped out completely,
> even in Italy, until the early 400's, a hundred years
> after the Donatists had parted ways.

The last reference to the the "rebaptizati" (but only in Africa) is in AD 768. Female priests 
and prophetesses were common features of non-Catholic branches of Roman Christianity 
(and charismatic movements more generally, if Mary Eddy Baker and Emma Hale Smith are 
any indication)

The Berber Jew who led a revolt against the earliest Muslims was Kohena (the Priestess).

> 
> > >  I think yes on both counts, but this isn't set
> > > in stone yet.
> > 
> > Wow. That was unexpected! I would have thought
> > that in such an ecclesiastical tradition, only a
> > priest would be able to enact a consecration.
> > 
> 
> Well, the Donatist ecclesiastical tradition admits
> female priests and has preserved the office of
> deaconess.  Virgins and widows often function in
> various church offices and those married to priests or
> other officers of the church frequently assist in the
> duties of their husbands.
> 
> > Even in realtively ideosyncratic Telerani
> > Christianity, only the priest can consecrate
> > bread for communion.
> > 
> > Anyone ought to be able bless bread, but
> > consecrating is a typically priestly function. At
> > least in the Catholic, Orthodox and related
> > traditions.
> > 
> > What tradition are you coming from where
> > individuals do it themselves?
> > 
> 
> Charismatic.  And it isn't always done that way, but
> it is an option which is sometimes practiced.

The original Donatists were obsessed with the purity of the apostolic succession, so I find 
this group approach to the consecration hard to credit. On the other hand, African 
tradition at the time of the traditores rquired twelve bishops for a valid ordination, so I 
suppose a tradition of group consecration could develop.

> 
> > > Thank you Padraic.  Your questions and comments
> > > are just the thing to bring this into better 
> > > focus for me. Interracting with you is quite 
> > > fruitful.
> > 
> > You're very welcome, and the gratitude is mutual!
> > I find your descriptions of C-a very interesting
> > as well as inspiring.
> > 
> > Padraic.
> > 
> 
> Thankee well.  Has thou any other icunus Carnovanus to
> share beside the Abgar?
> 
> Adam
> 
> Jin nifalud fistus todus idavi eseud adimpuudu ul isu fi aved niminchunadu pera ul Dju 
peu'l medju djul provedu cumvi dichid: «Iñi! Cunchepijid ed nadajid il virdjini ad junu  
huiju, ed cuamajuns ad si il Emanueli fi sñivigad ul Dju simu noviscu.»
> 
> Machu 1:22-23