[YG Conlang Archives] > [romconlang group] > messages [Date Index] [Thread Index] >


[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

Re: Natus



--- In romconlang@yahoogroups.com, Adam Walker <carrajena@y...> wrote:
> 
> --- Jan van Steenbergen <ijzeren_jan@y...>
> wrote:
> > > > "Unde S'a nãscut Hristos 
> > >
> > > "Where was Christ born
> > >
> > > It is close enough though to make me guess that in
> > > Romanina the psas participle is regularly derived
> > from
> > > NASCERE not decended from NATUS.
> > 
> > It actually turns out to be quite close to the
> > Wenedyk form, "naszkut".
> > 
> > Jan
> > 
> 
> So now I've got Wenedyk with tons of inherited
> irregular pp's, French with at least this one,
> Fortunatian with at least this one.  Romanian with at
> least this one regularly derived.  
> 
> And  . . . What of Spanish, Catalan, Italian etc.  For
> that matter how common are inherited irregulars vs
> regularized pp's in French and Romanian?  
> 
> What with Fortunatian being derived directly from CL
> rather than VL I'd guess it retains Latin's inventory
> of irregulars with some minor changes.
> 
> Adam
Including jabix [d_ZabiS] < gabisum, from jaudau [d_Zodo] < gaudeo:
> 
> =====
> Indjindrud edjuebu ul Ozias ad ul Jotam.  Indjindrud edjuebu ul 
Jotam ad ul Acaz.  Indjindrud edjuebu ul Acaz ad ul Ezecias.  
Indjindrud edjuebu ul Ezecias ad ul Manases.  Indjindrud edjuebu ul 
Manases ad ul Amos.  Indjindrud edjuebu ul Amos ad ul Josias.    
> 
> Machu 1:9-10