[YG Conlang Archives] > [romconlang group] > messages [Date Index] [Thread Index] >


[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

Re: [romconlang] Re: Natus



--- Jan van Steenbergen <ijzeren_jan@hidden.email>
wrote:
> > > "Unde S'a n�scut Hristos 
> >
> > "Where was Christ born
> >
> > It is close enough though to make me guess that in
> > Romanina the psas participle is regularly derived
> from
> > NASCERE not decended from NATUS.
> 
> It actually turns out to be quite close to the
> Wenedyk form, "naszkut".
> 
> Jan
> 

So now I've got Wenedyk with tons of inherited
irregular pp's, French with at least this one,
Fortunatian with at least this one.  Romanian with at
least this one regularly derived.  

And  . . . What of Spanish, Catalan, Italian etc.  For
that matter how common are inherited irregulars vs
regularized pp's in French and Romanian?  

What with Fortunatian being derived directly from CL
rather than VL I'd guess it retains Latin's inventory
of irregulars with some minor changes.

Adam

=====
Indjindrud edjuebu ul Ozias ad ul Jotam.  Indjindrud edjuebu ul Jotam ad ul Acaz.  Indjindrud edjuebu ul Acaz ad ul Ezecias.  Indjindrud edjuebu ul Ezecias ad ul Manases.  Indjindrud edjuebu ul Manases ad ul Amos.  Indjindrud edjuebu ul Amos ad ul Josias.    

Machu 1:9-10