[YG Conlang Archives] > [romanceconlang group] > messages [Date Index] [Thread Index] >
--- habarakhe4 <theophilus88@hidden.email> wrote:
> > Is that a final [s] > [x]? Fachyqui!?
> >
> No!
> /s/ [s] > /x/ [S] (Old Castilian/Portugese
> orthographic use)
Ah, I see. I've always liked the sound of final
[S].
> So what is the difference between logs and
> llockes?
Er, they're spelled different? The official
reason is that the first one is Brithenig
influenced, the other is the native form. Only
problem is, the Brithenig version is spelled
with a typically Kerno single initial L, while
the native form is spelled with a typically
Brithenig double LL. K' ystrang!
Padraic.
=====
Ces ystes llockes ne puhoeis pass evitar:
logs le nacier-si
logs le morir-si
logs l' enterreir-si.
.