[YG Conlang Archives] > [romanceconlang group] > messages [Date Index] [Thread Index] >

Re: [romanceconlang] ser/estar & por/para

• From: Anton Sherwood <bronto@hidden.email>
• Date: Fri, 11 Apr 2003 18:06:17 -0700
• Subject: Re: [romanceconlang] ser/estar & por/para
• To: romanceconlang@yahoogroups.com

Adam Walker wrote:
> Does the ser/estar distinction exist in Romlangs beyond Iberia?

Italian has <essere, stare>,
but the past participle is <stato> for both.

--
Anton Sherwood, http://www.ogre.nu/

• References:
  • ser/estar & por/para
    • From: Adam Walker <carrajena@hidden.email>

• Prev by Date: Re: [romanceconlang] ser/estar & por/para
• Next by Date: Re: [romanceconlang] ser/estar & por/para
• Previous by thread: Re: [romanceconlang] ser/estar & por/para
• Next by thread: Re: [romanceconlang] ser/estar & por/para
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread