[YG Conlang Archives] > [romanceconlang group] > messages [Date Index] [Thread Index] >

CL and VL: the differences

• From: "Ash" <equinus100@hidden.email>
• Date: Mon, 19 Aug 2002 23:08:30 +0530
• Subject: CL and VL: the differences
• To: <romanceconlang@yahoogroups.com>

While we are at the topic of the distinction between classical and vulgar Latins..

It is said that Satiricon by Petronius is the only known Latin work which is written in VL, or something close to that. Can some one point out (or give a link of a site that shows) the key differences between classical Latin and Petronian usage?

Ash

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: [romanceconlang] CL and VL: the differences
    • From: Jan van Steenbergen <ijzeren_jan@hidden.email>

• Prev by Date: Re: [romanceconlang] Language names (was: Greetings and Intro to my projects)
• Next by Date: Re: [romanceconlang] CL and VL: the differences
• Previous by thread: Wenedyk - Master (?) Plan
• Next by thread: Re: [romanceconlang] CL and VL: the differences
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread