[YG Conlang Archives] > [engelang group] > messages [Date Index] [Thread Index] >


[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

Re: [engelang] tanru




On Thu, Nov 29, 2012 at 4:18 PM, Philip Newton <philip.newton@hidden.email> wrote:
 

On 28 November 2012 01:32, Mike S. <maikxlx@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Nov 27, 2012 at 3:43 PM, John E Clifford <kali9putra@hidden.email> wrote:
>>
>> Of course, [school] has other places as well, for subjects taught, grade range, and probably others which are crucial to being a school.
>
> I would hope that "grade range" would not be part of the argument structure of "school". That would be like adding "mother's hair color" to the argument structure of "human". In such a language, people with bald mothers would not be "human". And schools that dispensed with formal gradings (as some educational approaches would have it, I gather) would not be "schools".

You seem to interpret "grade" as meaning "a letter, number, or other
symbol indicating the relative quality of a student's work in a
course, examination, or special assignment; mark. " (#7 at
dictionary.com); I interpreted it as meaning "a single division of a
school classified according to the age or progress of the pupils. In
the U.S., public schools are commonly divided into twelve grades below
college. " (#4 at dictionary.com).

So you might have an "elementary school" with grade range something
like "1-5", or a "junior high school" with a grade range of something
like "6-8" or the like.

mu'o mi'e .filip.

Yes that was my interpretation, and your interpretation of "grade" may be the intended one.  I don't think it affects my point that "ckule" is bloated though.



--
co ma'a mke

Xorban blog: Xorban.wordpress.com
My LL blog: Loglang.wordpress.com