On Mon, Sep 24, 2012 at 9:38 AM, John E Clifford <kali9putra@hidden.email> wrote:
Explain to me again how these MS differ from L-sets or just bunches. I don't see it from this.
My best guess: An L-set is the extension of a predicate with no individualization implied. It's more similar to John Cowan's massification of bears than it is to a myopic singular. A myopic singular is a blurring of individuals into a single prototype or a mean average of some sort. For masses, presumably it's some sort of homogenization. However you describe it, it's a function from an extension or from an intension to something more abstract than either.
(On a side note: I would like to acknowledge And's and Jorge's messages on "la sma", but I am going to wait until I can sum up my thoughts a little better than I can at the moment.)