[YG Conlang Archives] > [engelang group] > messages [Date Index] [Thread Index] >
Jorge Llamb�as, On 30/08/2012 01:14:
On Wed, Aug 29, 2012 at 11:04 AM, Mike S.<maikxlx@gmail.com> wrote:lake ptfake tvlake= la sma le ptfake tvlake. "Something, the one fathered by that, he talks to them." "Someone talks to the one whom he is the father of."[...]So, unless I'm missing something, Bake is a equivalent to "Ba sma Be". Not strictly needed, but a useful tool whenever two variables have restrictions using different arguments in the same formula....and both are bound by the same type of binder. What about when f- or b- are used instead of k-. Unless k- is put in a separate selma'o from the others, they should have meaning too. I can't quite see anything useful for them though. ? Bafe<formula1> <formula2>= Ba sma Be<formula1>fe<formula2>fe Or does -fe attach to only one of the formulas?
"Bafe bcda fgha djna'ake" "I know that Ba bcda fgha" ... alongside my suggested "djna'akoi Ba bcda fgha" --And.