[YG Conlang Archives] > [ceqli group] > messages [Date Index] [Thread Index] >


[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

Re: [ceqli] Names



On 8/9/05, Rex May <rmay@hidden.email> wrote:
> I continue to agonize over names.  I first encountered the concept of names as a distinct
> grammatical category in Loglan, and I was intrigued by it.  I think that in one way or
> another this concept is pretty essential to language.  Now, I've considered the Loglan
> system, which, essentially, requires that all names end in consonants, which makes them
> distinct from all other words.  However, if we're going to have self-segregating
> morphology, this entails requiring that names always be followed by a pause, so that the
> consonant won't seem to be part of the following word.  This makes for a large variety of
> possible names, and for terse ones, for that matter, but the pause rule gives me pause.

I think the mandatory pauses around foreign words
(and in a few other contexts, if I remember right)
are one of the most annoying features of Lojban,
which is otherwise pretty cool.

> I've thought of calling for a glottal stop instead of a pause, but then it would have to have
> a letter, or some kind of a rule that a blank space after a cuaba (the Ceqli version of the
> 'end in a consonant' rule would of course be 'end in a cuaba) calls for that glottal stop.  We
> could then have some monosyllabic names, which would be nice:
 
> janzo duel ci dom > jans (or whatever) duel ci dom
> 
> But I think that's beginning to look non-Ceqli.

I don't think it's a good idea to add a phoneme to an IAL 
that is used for one narrow purpose like this -- 
especially the glottal stop, which (when not surrounded by 
vowels on each side) can be hard for some people to 
pronounce.

> Anyhow, to summarize, here's the way I see Ceqli names at this point:
> 
> The name root is followed by -zo in all cases:   janzo, jansonzo, xikagozo, etc.
> And in order to specify what sort of thing is named, the whole thing can be sa'ed or hu'ed:

This is good.  I think you should stick with it.
I have more name suffixes in gjax-zym-byn, but just one is
probably right for an IAL.

-- 
Jim Henry
http://www.pobox.com/~jimhenry/review/log.htm