[YG Conlang Archives] > [ceqli group] > messages [Date Index] [Thread Index] >


[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

Re: [ceqli] Names, bound morphemes



On 6/13/05, John F. Schilke, MD <jfs.md@hidden.email> wrote:
> 
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Rex May - Baloo"
> > I'm thinking about the name problem.  Loglan and Lojban have an awkward
> way
> > of doing names, which is why I selected the 'ti' to mark names.  Now, I'm
> > thinking of having a bound morpheme that mark names of people or things.
> It
> > needs to be short.  Perhaps ye /Ze/.  Or fe. Or se.  Se is now available

> Of these choices, I'd like (on esthetic grounds) either ye or se.  The

Any of the ones with voiced fricative + /e/ sound OK to me.
But I'm wondering how much you've considered using prefix 
vs. suffix for this?  I use several different name suffixes for my
own conlang gjax-zym-byn - "ram" for personal names, "kxam"
for foreign language titles, "sqam" for family names, /wam/ for place names...
But, I've found that as suffixes they are occasionally inconvenient;
it might be better to use a prefix or prepositive particle to indicate that
a foreign name that might not fit ceqli morphophonology is about to follow,
and that even if it sounds like a ceqli word it isn't one --- rather
than a suffix that says that _what you've just heard_ is a proper name.

-- 
Jim Henry
http://www.pobox.com/~jimhenry/review/log.htm