[YG Conlang Archives] > [ceqli group] > messages [Date Index] [Thread Index] >
on 4/19/02 8:51 AM, John Schilke at doc@hidden.email wrote: > Rex saith: >> Me talking now. I like ke, because it is very handy and recalls the >> various Romance language que's. The way we're using ke seems to be the > way >> Loglan uses lepo. Should we look into aping the Loglan system here? > > No. Like you, I prefer "ke." > John Does anybody know if the Lojban system differs from the Loglan po, pu, zo system? Right now I'm wondering if ke should be equivalent to po or to lepo, and if the latter, how we express just plain po and lopo. -- >PLEASE NOTE MY NEW E-MAIL ADDRESS: rmay@hidden.email > Rex F. May (Baloo) > Daily cartoon at: http://www.cnsnews.com/cartoon/baloo.asp > Buy my book at: http://www.kiva.net/~jonabook/gdummy.htm > Language site at: http://www.geocities.com/ceqli/Uploadexp.htm >Discuss my auxiliary language at http://groups.yahoo.com/group/txeqli/