[YG Conlang Archives] > [ceqli group] > messages [Date Index] [Thread Index] >


[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

Re: [txeqli] Re: More Sounds



Javier wrote:

>> His nasal schwa idea sounds interesting as well, 
>> but does it work with -ng/-ny-?
> 
> I took the idea from listening to Cherokee. And of course
> it works with -ng/-ny- as well as it works with any
> other nasal consonant; the nasality of the vowel and the
> nasality of the consonant are independent, in the same
> manner as the voicing of the vowel doesn't interfere with
> the voicelessness of p, t or k. Nasalization of the
> adjacent vowels to a nasal consonant is just a local habit
> of some American English pronounciations, not a general,
> universal phonetic rule.

Ok, good, I thought so, but I wasn't sure.


> Prsonally, I prefer "ñ" to the digraph "ny", because
> in Spanish there's a difference between the palatal
> nasal ñ and a nasal followed by the semivowel y (n+y).
> The final syllables in "España" and "escaño" don't sound
> like the final ones in "Hispania" and "geranio".

Exactly why I put the sound into the alphabet, but using y. 

> Why not just using <y> for the schwa, <j> for /j/,
> <w> for /w/ and <h> for /h/, leaving aside the palatal
> nasal and reducing the set ch/sh/dj/zh to just sh/zh or
> ch/dj?

I think those are redundant, when i and u can make those sounds. And I 
think I agree with Rex in that I prefer i and u over y and w.
 
> And regarding the voicing of "h", that's not the
> only consonant not to have a pair: none of the weaks
> has it either. So, just make "h" be one of them.

When I wrote 'consonants' I meant the non-weaks. But if H was not to be 
schwa, it being a weak would be ok by me. Not that the consonants must be 
in pairs---that just happens to be the case and I used it to isolate h.


>> This system I think seems less 'forced' than Rex's. Only W for zh 
> and H 
>> for schwa are a little odd, but the rest work well. Also, Ceqli 
> stays 
>> Ceqli.
> 
> And why not the one I've proposed, which is much less
> forced than both yours and Rex's:
> 
> Vowels
> i /i/
> e /e/ or /E/ --or better the middle sound between both
> a /a/
> o /o/ or /O/ --idem  (as in Spanish)
> u /u/
> y /@/ or /@~/
> 
> Consonants
> p /p/
> b /b/
> f /f/
> v /v/
> t /t/
> d /d/
> s /s/
> z /z/
> c /S/ or /tS/
> x /Z/ or /dZ/
> k /k/
> g /g/
> 
> Weaks
> m /m/
> n /n/
> q /N/
> l /l/
> r /r/
> w /w/
> j /j/
> h /h/

Just to summarize, our systems differ in
-letters for /tS/ and /dZ/ or not
-use of h
-y/w vs. i/u
(-ny- sound or not)


-- 
Alexander Browne | alexbrowne@hidden.email
Saint Paul, Minn., U.S.