[YG Conlang Archives] > [ceqli group] > messages [Date Index] [Thread Index] >
On Sun, Mar 03, 2002 at 05:32:55PM -0800, Mike Wright wrote: > They both seem fine to me. However, wasn't it Ray who said (speaking > of "jo" for "coffee") that it might be a good idea to save CV words > for grammatical particles? That could be a reason to go for something longer. This would be nice. As part of my Lojban bias, I'd like it if _all_ CV words were grammatical particles, but that would require changing lots of words like 'pe'. -- Rob Speer