[YG Conlang Archives] > [Latejami group] > messages [Date Index] [Thread Index] >
In a message dated 11/17/2005 9:14:56 PM Central Standard Time, geoff.hacker@hidden.email writes:
1. It was not; it was meant as an open noun. Maybe "dyecanzimaw"?
That is the correct form. What is the argument of this open noun?
2. Perhaps. But it was the only way I could think of to include the disjuncts in what would otherwise have been verbal anaphors that would not have included those disjuncts (and should have).
3. The verb was meant to be "byefwa", as in "to be a member". Maybe "byefwama"?
Yes, that makes a verb out of it.
Take 2:
Sya paw daydyepumbi se to jabawpunsenya cawme dyecanzimaw Zwesemo dyebawpumbansenya guse to sa ludyeka Gudyekanomo jawtwe Gwatyenomo jawtwe zoypoy jitwenga fwi byefwama gafyunome se Byaka syame gesoa jaku lovokoy to cime byofwi pawha syame byoha.
SPONSORED LINKS
Online social science degree Social science course Social science degree Social science education Bachelor of social science Social science major
YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS
- Visit your group "Ladekwa" on the web.
- To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
Ladekwa-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
- Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.