[YG Conlang Archives] > [westasianconlangs group] > messages [Date Index] [Thread Index] >
On Tuesday, January 13, 2004, at 10:06 PM, Isaac Penzev wrote:
Yitzik adds: On Tuesday, January 13, 2004 9:45 AM I wrote:Steg Belsky wrote:If i remember correctly, i think my Comparative Semitic Languages professor said that Ethiopic (or at least Ge`ez) lost gemination at some point in history, so the script has no way to represent it.I'm not sure it's true at the moment. From what I heard, both Ge`ez and Amaregna has gemination, but it is not represented in script. When I come home, I'll givea look into my Linguistic Dictionary for more accuracy.The passage from the Linguistic Dictionary says:"Ethio-Semitic verbal system is characterized with gemination of penultimate root consonant in forms without meaning of 'intensive', 'full-voweled' model of imperfective (yə1ä22ə3) [...] Affirmative perfective stem in South E.-S. langs with gemination of the second root consonant is opposed to a non-geminated stem in North E.-S. langs."-- Yitzik
Ohwell, guess i did misremember. Bleah. -Stephen (Steg) "i am... me." ~ 'eden' by guster