[YG Conlang Archives] > [westasianconlangs group] > messages [Date Index] [Thread Index] >


[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

Re: [westasianconlangs] /h/



On Wednesday, October 29, 2003, at 04:51  PM, Pavel Adamek wrote:
Is /h/ in Semitic languages
voiceless [h] or voiced [h\]?

AFAIK it's voiceless [h].
At least that's what it is in Modern Standard Hebrew.

It seems slightly strange to me
that the voiceless fricative is used to mark [a:].
(/j/ and /w/ are voiced, aren't they?)
Would not be `ajin more appropriate?
      P.A.

I've gotten the impression that at least in Arabic, final |taa marbuuta| is pronounced at least a little as a (weaker than normal?) [h] when it isn't a [t]. [a:] and [h] seem to go together better to me than [a:] and [3] (`ayin) would, since [3] has the pharyngeal constriction that doesn't appear in [a:]. [a:] and [h] seem to have almost the same shape in the vocal tract except for what the vocal cords themselves are doing.


-Stephen (Steg)
 "[s@li:HO:]!"