Re: [romconlang] Re: [CONLANG] Conlang Dialog

From: Benct Philip Jonsson <bpj@hidden.email>
Date: Thu, 11 Jun 2009 17:30:24 +0200
Subject: Re: [romconlang] Re: [CONLANG] Conlang Dialog
To: romconlang@yahoogroups.com

James Campbell (zolid.com) skrev:

BPJ eskrï¿½ ï¿½

Jo crair che feï¿½ un erraur ci:

8<

	HABERE	havair	[@v'aI4]    'to have'

	*HAO	hua	    [wa]
     HABES   heu     [y]
     *HAT    hat     [at]
     HABEMUS havaim  [@'vaIm]
     HABETIS havaiï¿½  [@'vaIs]
     *HAUNT  haun    [aUn]


Really nice; pleasing; elegant. :)

James


Jo ares realizai un aotre fatx inequitiant:
en el preterit (perfetch Latï¿½) la
saule diference entre la 2de persone
del singuliar e del pluriao serat che
el singuliar hat afecï¿½ï¿½u!

I just realized another disturbing fact:
in the preterite (Latin perfect) the
only difference between the second
person singular and plural will be that
the singular has umlaut!

*AMASTI	  hemes [^1]
*AMASTES  hamas

*HABUSTI  heveus
*HABUSTES havus

/Bendetx

References:
- Re: [CONLANG] Conlang Dialog
  - From: "James Campbell \(zolid.com\)" <kraamlep@hidden.email>

Prev by Date: Re: [CONLANG] Conlang Dialog
Next by Date: change
Previous by thread: Re: [CONLANG] Conlang Dialog
Next by thread: change
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread