[YG Conlang Archives] > [romconlang group] > messages [Date Index] [Thread Index] >

[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

Re: [romconlang] re: VL Poter

----- Original Message ----- From: "Henrik Theiling" <theiling@hidden.email> 
To: <romconlang@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Thursday, July 12, 2007 2:30 PM
Subject: Re: [romconlang] re: VL Poter

Daniel Prohaska writes:



Perhaps something like the following would work:

POTER(E)------------------------------------------------
                                sg.                         pl.
no.                         *potêr(e)              *potêrês/*potêrî
ge./da.                 *potêrî                  *potêrîs
ac.                          *potêre                 *potêrês
--------------------------------------------------------------


I just looked it up: I seem to have come to similar conclusions in
Þrjótrunn:

http://www.kunstsprachen.de/lex.cgi?domain=s17;c-305=1;action=infl
http://www.kunstsprachen.de/lex.cgi?domain=s17;c-562=1;action=infl

**Henrik
My sound changes run mainly on a CL vocab (because that's the dictionary I have...) and start with a few changes to make the vocab at little easier on the Germanic tongue - giving me, if you like, a "Northern VL" parallel to the VL that developed elsewhere - before striking off on its own down the High German path. 

On that basis, starting from my own "NVL" I came up with the following
Late Latin ("NVL") Proto-N Rom Old Rinench Mid Rinench Mod Rinench Nom S/P pote:r / pote:ri: poter / - - Acc S/P pote:ru / pote:ro:s poter / - - Dir S/P - - posser / possieri posser / possier@ posser / possi:r@ Gen S/P pote:ri: / pote:ro:ru pote:ri su / pote:rur possierisu / possierur possieris@ / possier@r possi:ri:s@ / possi:r@r Dat S/P pote:ro: / pote:ri:z pote:ru / pote:ri possieru / possieri possier@ / possier@ possi:r@ / possi:r@