[YG Conlang Archives] > [romconlang group] > messages [Date Index] [Thread Index] >


[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

Re: 3rd person pronouns - Einglek



Which I still might do, I'm still revising my 'Grand Master Plan.'  I
probably will go ahead and reduce final-syllable vowels, bringing me
back to the original problem of indistinguishable pronouns.

What's the likelihood of borrowing 3rd person pronouns?  I know
English borrowed "they," but I imagine such borrowing is uncommon.


--- In romconlang@yahoogroups.com, Steg Belsky <draqonfayir@...> wrote:
>
> I'd think that for something English-like you'd be *wanting* to get  
> rid of gender distinctions, case endings, and other un-Englishy  
> features.
> 
> -Stephen (Steg)
> 
> 
> On Jun 13, 2007, at 8:17 PM, funkymonkey1148 wrote:
> 
> > Thanks for the quick reply.
> >
> > I've thought about something like that (*ILLE-IPSE/*IPSE-ILLE) but the
> > results turn out too long for a 3rd person pronoun.
> >
> > Another thing I've tried is reworking the sound changes by starting
> > with Classical Latin long-short vowel system (about 10 vowels) instead
> > of Vulgar Latin's 7 thus making it easier to make my English-like
> > sound changes closer to the real thing.  I also reduce the amount of
> > final vowel reduction.  Doing that, I have much less leveling and
> > retain enough final vowel distinctions for gender distinction.
> >
> > Still, I'd like any more ideas for 3rd person pronouns for a  
> > romance lang.
> >
> > -G
> >
> >
> > --- In romconlang@yahoogroups.com, Steg Belsky <draqonfayir@>  
> > wrote:
> >>
> >> What about compounding?
> >> I haven't working on my romance conlang in a while, so i've forgotten
> >> what they look like in different genders and cases, but could you
> >> have something like *ILLE-IPSE be one gender pronoun and *IPSE-ILLE
> >> be the other one?  Or similar compounding of pronouns and/or pronoun-
> >> like words?
> >>
> >> -Stephen (Steg)
> >>
> >>
> >> On Jun 13, 2007, at 11:35 AM, funkymonkey1148 wrote:
> >>
> >>> Hello all!  Long time lurker here, but first post.
> >>>
> >>> I'm working on a conlang that applies English-like sound changes to
> >>> Vulgar Latin (changes from about the pre-West Germanic era up to the
> >>> British-American split).  It's not exact, but so far I generally  
> >>> like
> >>> the results.
> >>>
> >>> In this conlang, tentatively called "Einglek," the many sound  
> >>> changes
> >>> have leveled the verb conjugations (happy with that), leveled the
> >>> cases (don't mind that) and have led me to get rid of grammatical
> >>> gender (at first annoyed me, but is growing on me).  The problem is
> >>> that I'd still like to have gendered 3rd person pronouns to
> >>> distinguish male/female beings.  So far, using ILLE or IPSE produces
> >>> too similar pronouns.  Perhaps I could use IS, but then the feminine
> >>> accusative singular comes out equal to the nominative.
> >>>
> >>> Any other suggestions?
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> To unsubscribe, send an email to:
> >>> romconlang-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> Yahoo! Groups Links
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > To unsubscribe, send an email to:
> > romconlang-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
> >
> >
> > Yahoo! Groups Links
> >
> >
> >
> >
>