[YG Conlang Archives] > [romconlang group] > messages [Date Index] [Thread Index] >


[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

Re: [romconlang] Auxiliary Romlangs VS Artistic Romlangs



On 1/28/07, spad0103 <spad0103@hidden.email> wrote:

 - Artistic romlangs are quite beautiful or styled but can anyone
 learn them, except their creator? I'm often fed up with reading
 their hundred-page grammars and vocabularies. People making them
 often forget the fact that someone can be interested in learning
 them! I ask sometimes people about it and they just tell me they
 don't care about making people learn it.

If someone is interested in learning Montrei (my language), then
they'll take the time to learn it. Besides, when I went about creating
Montrei, I didn't make it easy to learn (despite the fact that it
works very much like Spanish, so a Spanish speaker would have just a
few rules to remember). I made it pretty *to me* and interesting *to
me*. An Artlanger doesn't make a creation for anyone but themselves
(usually). If I were in this to make a language easy for people to
learn, I'd have made an auxlang (and this is how you can tell one of
two mindsets).



 I'm just between these two kinds. I want to make my language
 beautiful and I want to make people learn it... Am I the only one
 here in this group?

 See you!

 Nemszev,
 the creator of Vrialese, a romance conlang,
 which you can read on my blog: http://nemszev.hautetfort.com