[YG Conlang Archives] > [romconlang group] > messages [Date Index] [Thread Index] >
Two last messages I sent to Romconlang, were lost. I re-post them, without looking at the later messages (after 01/26/2007 11:08am GMT). If somebody has already said something similar, never mind. =======RE-POST #1======= Jacques Dehee escrivi: | il es interesante d'elaborar un lingua construite | confortabile pro usatores de cultura romance Esta idea puode paresser buona, ma que cosa es "comfortable"? Cad'una lengua deve ser aprisa por la usar correctamente, e no solamente la comprender... E no todo puodes comprender, si no saves cambyos de los sonos en parablas populares. Que cosa es, por exemplo, "vezer" o "crezer" o "bghanco" en uno de mis projectos? =======RE-POST #2======= ja' Jacques Dehee: <<< I mean a successful romance conlang, not a cryptogram ! >>> Ma per Ercolo, Giacobbo! What the hell do you mean by "successful"??? FYI, I could understand ca. 70% of the Kerno (was it Kerno?) text in Pardaic's msg. It was definitely Romance, dammit. -- Y.