[YG Conlang Archives] > [romconlang group] > messages [Date Index] [Thread Index] >
Padraic Brown skrev:
--- Jacques Deh�e <jacquesdehe@hidden.email> wrote:il es interesante d'elaborar un lingua construite confortabile pro usatores de cultura romanceGouerement! Goueldreus ty amplificar poz c' alch cante Roman? ays ces chantes vult, hos-ci. foreth il c' ist o c' acel cants il ma o menus conforteible. Dom-placereus ar-z-other alch ke crezes ty ynteresant, ystrang o mer niconforteible di 's nusteor chantes! Padraic PS (Yes, it is, indeed. Would you care to elaborate on a comfortable Romance conlang? There's a lot of them out there, some more or less comfortable. I'd be interested in hearing what you find interesting or even uncomfortable about the various Romance conlangs that get discussed here.)
Es cluar che confortauld� restet nil egl del ogladaur. Se saul considruam il ling remen� << nateurel >> chesc tient seu affetxoned, a cause che 'l gust de difrint perseun nones d'acord. Vairl� anc il molt divirs ling remen� constreut! Txo ch' es facel paull un es fod paull oltre, e medais el << bosu� >> es sujetxif: quelc preferron el dol�, may eltre 'l dur. Anc el gust del rythme se diffret, caum mostret la diverst� de la m�siche! En brief, txo ch'es confortaul paull un puot esser desplaciant paull oltre. Txes es caum deuraut esser. /Bendetx It is clear that comfortableness lies in the eye of the beholder. If we only consider the Romance natlangs each has its devotees, because the taste of different people is not in agreement. Thus also the very diverse Romance conlangs! That which is easy for one person is bland for another, and even 'euphony' is subjective: some prefer the sweet, but others the hard. Also the taste in rythm differs, as is shown by the diversity in music! In short that which is confortable for one person may be unpleasant for another. This is as it should be. /Benct