[YG Conlang Archives] > [romconlang group] > messages [Date Index] [Thread Index] >
On Tue, Jun 01, 2004 at 01:43:59PM -0700, Anton Sherwood wrote: > Mark J. Reed wrote: > > . . . The reconstructed Classical pronunciation of > > Latin has no falling diphthongs. . . . > > As I understand the term, a falling diphthong is one whose core > is its first element, like /aj/. Is one of us confused? Apparently so. I thought falling diphthongs where ones where the first element was the higher (semi)vowel (the i/j or u/w), and therefore the tongue has to "fall" in the course of pronouncing the syllable. Judges? -Mark