[YG Conlang Archives] > [romconlang group] > messages [Date Index] [Thread Index] >
--- In romconlang@yahoogroups.com, "dhasenan" <faceloran@j...> wrote: > --- In romconlang@yahoogroups.com, "habarakhe4" <theophilus88@h...> > wrote: > > Ut.unata Arabic Script > > > > Here is my proposal for Ut.unata in Arabic script. It was used in > > the Fortunate Isles under Muslim domination, and still is used by > > the Ut.unata community in the city of Bele_n in al-Wiraniyya > (Muslim > > South America) > > > > /p/ pa' (ba' with three dots below) > > Wouldn't this better be ba' with two dots below? Three dots seems to > indicate an alveolar fricative; two has more diverse uses. Ba' with > three dots below I'd expect to be a retroflex or a labial fricative. /p/ is taken directly from the Persian abjad > > On the other hand, I'm assuming that language should make sense, > which is a totally unfounded and illogical assumption. > > <snip> > > > /J/ nun + three dots above > > So you're broadening the usage of three dots rather than having a > pair hanging near every third letter. Ut.unata does not need thaa'. > > > /di/ da' + ya' > > /di\/ da' > > /du/ da' + waw > > /de/ da' + kasra > > /d8/ da' + fath.a > > /do/ da' +d.amma > > /da/ da' + 'alif > > /d/ da' + sukun > > Interesting. So a combination of /dj/ or /dw/ is impossible? Or would > you need to memorize the difference? And are the vowels usually > written? Can you omit the diacritic vowels? the glide symbols used as > vowels? /dw/ does not exist; /j/ appears as allophone of /i/. Are you suggesting a less differentiated system like this? /w/ [u], [o] /y/ [i], [e] /'/ [a], [8] // [], [i\] I've decided to add alif /'/ as a support consonant for vowels. > > # Christopher Wright