[YG Conlang Archives] > [romconlang group] > messages [Date Index] [Thread Index] >
At 14:48 2.2.2004, Jan van Steenbergen wrote:
Yes, in this light Slezan "mucht" seems improbable, although I should admit that I sort of like it. Perhaps we should go for "mlt" after all; "mucht" and/or "mujt" could still be used in dialects. "Lacht" for "milk" OTOH can quietly stay. :)
Slvanjec of course has _mlt, lac_.
/BP 8^)
--
B.Philip Jonsson mailto:melrochX@hidden.email (delete X)
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~__
A h-ammen ledin i phith! \ \
__ ____ ____ _____________ ____ __ __ __ / /
\ \/___ \\__ \ /___ _____/\ \\__ \\ \ \ \\ \ / /
/ / / / / \ / /Melroch\ \_/ // / / // / / /
/ /___/ /_ / /\ \ / /'Aestan ~\_ // /__/ // /__/ /
/_________//_/ \_\/ /Eowine __ / / \___/\_\\___/\_\
Gwaedhvenn Angeliniel\ \______/ /a/ /_h-adar Merthol naun
~~~~~~~~~Kuinondil~~~\________/~~\__/~~~Noolendur~~~~~~
|| Lenda lenda pellalenda pellatellenda kuivie aiya! ||
"A coincidence, as we say in Middle-Earth" (JRR Tolkien)