[YG Conlang Archives] > [romconlang group] > messages [Date Index] [Thread Index] >
--- In romconlang@yahoogroups.com, "Jan van Steenbergen" <ijzeren_jan@y...> wrote: > --- habarakhe4 skrzypszy: > > <snip a lot> > > Strange, I wrote a longer reply two or three days ago, and apparently > it didn't get through at all. Anyway, thanks for the explanation! > > One question I recall: > > > > > o: > au [o] > > If that is the case, then why > > > w/v > b lavo: > rabo: > > and not rabau? > Mu fotau drati. (I apologize). o: > [o] <au> w/v > [b] <b> <o> cannot represent [o], because <o> represents [@] or [8]. > Jan