[YG Conlang Archives] > [romanceconlang group] > messages [Date Index] [Thread Index] >


[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

Re: [romanceconlang] AW: Vegliot/Noricum



 --- Daniel Ryan Prohaska skrzypszy: 

> Would you happen to know how to get in touch with Frank George Valoczy?
> I tried the e-mail he provided on his web-site, but it bounced back
> unfortunately. I'd like to exchange notes. 

Sorry for being late with an answer. I have been buried under a pile of unread
email, and only now I am trying to catch up.
I don't think Ferko is a member of this group, although he is a member of
Conculture and Slaviconlang. His address is: valoczy @ vcn.bc.ca .

> Some of his extrapolations are quite good, others just go against the
> evidence that is actually there, such as s-plurals. I don't see any
> evidence of those. 

Well, the evidence available is rather limited. IIRC that was what originally
discouraged him from working on a true reconstruction, and caused the shift
towards a real conlang.

> "Dalmatesku" is of course very much like Romanian, wheraas I have the
> impression that natlang Dalmatian was between eastern Romance dialects
> (definately some connection to the Balkans), but also in touch with
> Friulian, and heavily influenced by Venetan. 
> So these dialects would be my base for reconstruction. Since there
> really is so little of Vegliot left (which is deplorable anyway) this
> "reconstruction" will have a very conlangy quality to it. But I will try
> to stick to the evidenec and incorporate as much of the original Vegliot
> as is there. 

Well, keep us posted!

> Aside from the above mentioned staement I've been tampering with a
> Romance conlang with the working title of "Noricum". This involves a
> group of Romance condialects spoken in various parts of what is eastern
> Austria today. I've been messing around with a couple of sound changes,
> but I haven' really arrived at something satisfactory as yet. To tell
> the truth, I'm still stuck in the 8th century with two dialects already
> and can't decide which way to turn.....perhaps a consonant shift similar
> to Upper German, with a further phonological development of central
> Bavarian? We'll see. I'll keep you posted.

Please do!
 
> I wass also thinking of morphophonemic alternations such as:
> 
> Lat <rogat>
> Lat <rogamus>
> Lat <rogatis>
> 
> Noricum <jE rOat>
>         <nUs @r'gaums>
>         <bus @r'gais(@s)>

Well, why not? It certainly looks interesting.

Jan

=====
"Originality is the art of concealing your source." - Franklin P. Jones

__________________________________________________
Yahoo! Plus - For a better Internet experience
http://uk.promotions.yahoo.com/yplus/yoffer.html