[YG Conlang Archives] > [romanceconlang group] > messages [Date Index] [Thread Index] >
--- Adam Walker skrzypszy: > Well, you weren't talking to me, but in Carrajena the > articles are ul, al and il but the "l" is only an > artifact of the spelling and is, in fact pronounced as > a "u". All final "l"'s have changed to /u/or/w/ in > C-a but in the articles alone the spelling remains > unchanged since the "l" reappears in liason, so > > ul = /u/ > al = /au/ > il = /iw/ Nice! Which one is which? I mean, ul = masc.sg., al = fem.sg., il = plur.? This reminds me of my first attempts at conlanging ever: sometime in my early teens, I think, I started making tables of a romlang. One of the things that I remember, is that since Spanish has "el" and Italian has "il", in my opinion there should also be a language that had "al" :))) . Wenedyk has "il\" as a demonstrative pronoun (masc./neut.sg.), and it is pronounced [iw]. Jan ===== "Originality is the art of concealing your source." - Franklin P. Jones __________________________________________________ Yahoo! Plus For a better Internet experience http://www.yahoo.co.uk/btoffer