[YG Conlang Archives] > [romanceconlang group] > messages [Date Index] [Thread Index] >


[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

Re: [romanceconlang] My romance lang.



magomagno2 scripsit:

> I'm working on my own ideal international Romance lang. I'm just
> calling it Neo-Latin for now(I know, not very original) Here's some
> of the basic stuff. Tell me what ya think.

I'm not a fan of "international" languages. And I get furious when I hear about
"ideal" languages. But since everybody is silent, let the Poisonous Snakie
talk...

> Nouns end in a, e, o, or u, according to their ablative singular
> ending in Latin.
> Aqua  Fratre
> Filio Fructu

Why should you keep -u? In most natlangs those stems merged with -o-stems.

> The plural is formed by adding -i.
> Aquai Fratrei
> Filioi Fructui

Why not -s ? Usually adding -i produces other phonetic changes.

> The definite article is il. The indefinite is un.

No gender? Strange... Romlangs used to have gender... But if ideal means
English-like, c'mon babe...

> The Genitive is formed with de.
> Il aqua de flumine. The river's water.
> De + il = Di. This is the only contraction in Neo Latin.

Why not "del" ? "Di" is a non-article form in Romlangs!

> In il nomine **de patre**, e di filio, e di spiritu sancti.

Of **a** father?

> The Dative is formed with a, ad

Why you call them "Genetive" and "Dative". Are they cases? ;))

> All adjectives end in the last remaining vowel, -i.
> The compartive is formed by adding -or.
> The superlative is formed by adding -ssimo

Isn't comp. and sup. adjectives too? Why they have different ending?

> Verbs have 4 tenses, Present, Past, Future, and Conditional.

You call Cond. "tense"?!!! Dog my cats!

> Well, what do ya think? I'm open to any comments or suggestions. I
> know you'll probably tell me to get rid of the verb conjugations, but
> I think they're easy enough to keep in.

Many many natural (read: ideal) languages have them more...
To end with, I think the lang you offer is not ideal. What are the criteria for
idealness? I'm quite sure Japanese is much more ideal: all cases are denoted by
postpositional particles, there are only 2 irregular verbs, the word order is
fixed. And Mandarin Chinese is almost perfect: it has neither declension, nor
conjugation.

Therefore, good luck!

~~~~~~ Yitzik the Poisonous Snakie ~~~~~~