[YG Conlang Archives] > [romanceconlang group] > messages [Date Index] [Thread Index] >
En réponse à "Etherman23 <etherman23@hidden.email>" <etherman23@hidden.email>: > Hi group, > > I've just started working on a Romance conlang called Orientis, and > not having any educational background in any Romance language, I find > myself very confused over vowels. Latin vowels distinguish between > quality and quantity. Unfortunately the terms long and short are used > for both traits. That's because quantity and quality are linked in Latin. In Classical Latin, the main trait is quantity only, and quality derives from it. So by knowing quantity, you already know quality. In Vulgar Latin, quantity distinctions disappeared but the quality distinctions stayed. Still, knowing the quantity distinctions of Classical Latin makes it quite easy to know the quality distinctions of Vulgar Latin. I've looked through several grammar books for help > but I've ended up more confused. Here's my problem: My Latin > dictionary says that it marks quantity with diacritics. However, it > doesn't do it consistently. I'm pretty sure it does. But if it does like my Latin books, it marks vowel quantity only when it's not derivable from the existing rules, i.e. when it's irregular. It also doesn't give the quantity of vowels in grammatical endings since those are supposed to be well-known already. It also gives several rules for > determining quantity, but these don't cover all possible cases and > quite frequently disagree with the diacritics. Which is quite logical since if it does like I think it does, the diacritics are there especially in order to mark an exceptional case! :) Other books I've > looked at indicate long quality with a macron (unmarked vowels are > considered short). They give the same rules about vowel quantity, > which means that they're incomplete. > No. Since vowel quality is directly derivable from vowel quantity, there's nothing to complete. > So I guess my question is, what are the rules for determining vowel > quantity and quality, if any? I don't want to get rid of quantity > (the easy solution) because Orientis is supposed to be Latin > influenced by Middle Persian which also has vowel quantity. > Actualy, there are no rules per se. Vowel quantity is phonemic in Classical Latin, and thus doesn't really obey "rules". There are tabulations (i.e. affixes always get the same quantity, for instance), but no real "rules". Moreover, some vowels could alternate from short to long depending on the surroundings. What there are on the other hand is rules to situate the stress according to the length of vowels. With those rules, you can easily guess the quantity of the penultimate syllable (which is why the penultimate is never marked for length since normally the stress is always indicated). On the other hand, there are rules to define *syllable* length, but I don't have them in head right now. As for quality, it's easily derived from quantity: - short high vowels tended to be lax, while long high vowels stayed tense (thus /i/ was rather [I] while /i:/ was [i:]), - short middle vowels tended to open (/e/ was nearer to [E], /o/ to [O]) while long middle vowels stayed closed (which is why, when quantity disappeared, they tended to get confused with short high vowels, which had already lowered their position), - /a/ stayed low [a], which is why it merged with /a:/ when length disappeared. Christophe. http://rainbow.conlang.free.fr Take your life as a movie: do not let anybody else play the leading role.