[YG Conlang Archives] > [romanceconlang group] > messages [Date Index] [Thread Index] >


[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

Re: Romance to be



> OK, after looking at it I don't have much more to say. According to 
the book 
> the picture is too blurred to give a secure answer. To get to 
|estre| (the Old 
> French form), you have to suppose a form *ESSRE instead of *ESSERE, 
something 
> not impossible but intriguing. Moreover, the participles |estant| 
and |esté| 
> cannot even be surely said to come from STARE. They could very well 
be a 
> creation from the new infinitive |estre|. So basically without a 
time machine 
> we'll never know :)) . But indeed, STARE at that time had given the 
verb 
> |ester| (which died out a little later), so a single origin from it 
is nearly 
> out of the question.

Apparently, the French infinitive does come from essere via: essere > 
essre* > estre** > e^tre) 

*(like pre(he)ndere to prendre) 
**(like camera to cjamera to tsjamera to tsjamra to tchambra to 
tchambre to chambre)

However, e'tant and e'te' did come from stare's forms.

(this is according to Larousse Nouveau Dictionnaire Etymologique)