[YG Conlang Archives] > [romanceconlang group] > messages [Date Index] [Thread Index] >


[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

Re: [romanceconlang] Definite article + posessive pronoun



--- Barry Garcia <barry_garcia@hidden.email> wrote:
> 
> Reading orbilat.com, i found out that the other
> Romance languages *except*
> Spanish use the definite articles with the posessive
> pronouns, 

If I recall right, Old Spanish does this. I think the
epic of El Cid was "El Cantar del mio Cid".

Kerno is no exception to this rule:

il/la mew/tew/sew || nusteor/vusteor. The feminine has
an archaic form, la meva; the plurals have an archaic
form as well, y vei, etc.

> emi
> etu
> evostro
> esu
> enostro
> 
> I kind of like the third choice the best, but i'd
> kind of like to get
> opinions on it before i decide.
> 

I rather like this one as well. I like the
amalgamation of article and adjective.

> The feminine are easiest:
> 
> lami
> latu
> lavostro
> lasu
> lanostro

Not lavostra?

Padraic.


=====
'n aon le prims, bes et 'mbrach;
'n aon le cerch, futeur et lugh;
'n aon le ters, dofert a' afert;
'n aon le coueart, y chorn ce quei mi tetulli-el!

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Finance - Get real-time stock quotes
http://finance.yahoo.com