[YG Conlang Archives] > [romanceconlang group] > messages [Date Index] [Thread Index] >


[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

Re: [romanceconlang] Tengo and Tenho



On Tue, Aug 06, 2002 at 12:10:18PM -0700, Barry Garcia wrote:
> 
> I'm wondering something. What verb form in Vulgar Latin spawned "tengo" in
> Castillian, and "tenho" in Portuguese?

Teneo -- 1st person singular indicative present of tenere.

The Portuguese form is a pretty straightforward development from Latin. The
unstressed /e/ would have ended up /j/, which palatalized the /n/.

The Spanish form is more complicated. I just looked this up in _From Latin to
Spanish_ to refresh my memory. According to that book, the -g- probably had
something to do with verbs whose stems ended in -ng in Latin, such as
<frangere>. Apparently those verbs developed such that the first person
singular had /ng/ but other forms had /nj/ because of the following front
vowel. So:

frango	 *franjemos
*franjes *franjetes
*franjet *franjent(maybe *frangont)

According to the hypothesis, people began mixing up the /ng/ and /nj/ forms
of these verbs, sometimes saying /frango/ and sometimes */franjo/. Now at
the same time there were verbs that ended in -/njo/ derived from Latin words
ending in -/nio/ or -/neo/; since people vacilated on whether to say
/frango/ or */franjo/, they extended that pattern to other -/njo/ verbs,
yielding */tenjo/ alongside /tengo/. For some reason /tengo/ won out.

Then there are words such as <valgo> and <salgo> whose /g/s might have been
extended from there.

-- 
Furrfu!		r a k k o  at  c h a r t e r  dot  n e t