[YG Conlang Archives] > [engelang group] > messages [Date Index] [Thread Index] >
Yes.
but focus should be on meaning and argument structure not on form.
This thread is for the long-term goal of completing Xorban's lexicon. Place anything related to the lexicon here.
I have been sifting through gismu somewhat randomly to start with, and an idea occurred to me. The basic idea is that stems could generally get relexed such that "CC" chunks give a mnemonic clue as to the stems' meaning, and the last C or CC places the stem in a semantic class. Without hashing out all the details, I'd like to hold a straw poll:
[Yes] I would like the lexicon to generally break down schematically into CC mnemonic clues (in other words, let's reorganize & overhaul the lexicon).
[No] I would like the lexicon to be random/naturalistic like the current gismu stems are (in other words, let's just remove the homonyms and add new stems as needed, but otherwise import the gismu as they are and as we have been using them).
I am looking for your initial reaction and thoughts here, nothing else.
--
co ma'a mke
Xorban blog: Xorban.wordpress.com
My LL blog: Loglang.wordpress.com
- References:
- [engelang] Xorban lexical design considerations
- From: "Mike S." <maikxlx@gmail.com>
- Prev by Date: Re: [engelang] Xorban: la je cmla nltra
- Next by Date: Re: [engelang] Xorban: la je cmla nltra
- Previous by thread: Re: [engelang] Xorban lexical design considerations
- Next by thread: Xorban: la je cmla nltra
- Index(es):