[YG Conlang Archives] > [engelang group] > messages [Date Index] [Thread Index] >

[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

Re: [engelang] reformulating the core grammar

Mike S., On 03/10/2012 00:52:



On Mon, Oct 1, 2012 at 6:54 PM, Jorge Llamb�as <jjllambias@hidden.email <mailto:jjllambias@hidden.email>> wrote:

    On Sun, Sep 30, 2012 at 7:29 AM, And Rosta <and.rosta@hidden.email <mailto:and.rosta%40gmail.com>> wrote:
     >
     > 5. Binder of vV is always fV [--Maybe; i forget if this is not always so]

    There was this example without fV:

     > la je ckfa va mlka prfraka'a
     > I prefer my coffee milky (to not milky)

    I'd like to replace vV with ni'u(kV), but before I do that I was
    hoping for some feedback on:

    http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/engelang/message/912

    co ma'a xrxe


I've completely ignored v- to date.  I will try to remedy that in the next day or so.


That gives me a suitable opportunity to say that I have ignored firstly your proposals for devices dealing with intensionality and secondly the termsets discussion. The intrinsic difficulty of those discussions coupled with my lack of time means I don't think I'll manage to read through them properly. If either set of proposals have settled down a bit, I'd welcome it if you could post a summary of them.

--And.