[YG Conlang Archives] > [engelang group] > messages [Date Index] [Thread Index] >


[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

Re: [engelang] Xorban: Semantics of "l-" (and "s-" and "r-")



Well, if you think all of these are covered by l, it is hardly surprising that the notion you have is incoherent to the point of contradiction.  And that is even without mentioning the question of context.

Sent from my iPad

On Sep 7, 2012, at 8:39 PM, "Mike S." <maikxlx@gmail.com> wrote:

 



On Fri, Sep 7, 2012 at 7:01 PM, John Cowan <cowan@hidden.email> wrote:
 

John E Clifford scripsit:



> Gavafuckingai!  The _expression_ "myopic singulars" takes me back (and
> not in a good way) to the olden days of the cross-talking arguments
> about the meaning of {lo} in Loglan, not to mention their continuation
> (and reiteration) in Lojban, the world of Trobriand Islanders

To set the record straight once for all about the Trobrianders:

Their language, Kilivila, is an ordinary classifier language like Chinese,
Japanese, or Bengali. That is, every noun is a mass noun, and to use a
noun with a cardinal number, a demonstrative, or the like, you need to
specify a classifier to specify how to subdivide the mass.

In English, which is not a classifier language, we have two types of
nouns, mass nouns and count nouns. The latter can be enumerated simply:
"one apple", "two apples", etc. But we cannot say "one maize", but must
say "one kernel of maize", "one ear of maize", "one kilo of maize", or
what have you. A sinophone would find the literal Chinese translation
of "one apple" as confusing as we do "one maize"; one needs to say "one
round-thing of apple", "one bowl of apple" (whole or in pieces according
to context), "one kilo of apple", etc. This is of course merely a
grammatical rule, not some kind of special and mysterious world-view
unique to the Trobrianders, or even the Chinese.

Interesting description of non-SAE language features noted and appreciated.

 
As for myopic singularization, in the Xorban context (if I understand
correctly) it is an operator that takes a predicate like "is a bear"
and produces a constant, "the bear-mass, the thing whose parts are
individual bears". This is what JCB called "Mr. Bear." It works like
any other constant in the FOPL context, with no confusions. It could
equally well produce a predicate "is the bear-thing", just as "Socrates"
could be treated as a predicate "is Socrates", and I take no position
on that, since it is easy to see how to translate one to the other.

I hope that is helpful.

"Bear-mass" is part of what "la crba" can signify and that's very useful, but unfortunately it doesn't seem to capture all needs:

John is fascinated by bears [the mass of bears? maybe].
John is shaped like a bear [the mass of bears? probably not].
John invented the widget [the mass of widgets? Not exactly right].
John designed a starship [the mass?--no, none have been built yet].

Those are some that come to mind.  There are plenty of others noted in the Lojban list archives.

These are all expressions in which "l-" is apparently required to cover, and not "s-" or "r-".  The squinting-singular has a lot of apparent readings.