[YG Conlang Archives] > [engelang group] > messages [Date Index] [Thread Index] >
On Sun, Sep 2, 2012 at 4:44 PM, And Rosta <and.rosta@hidden.email> wrote: > > I think the various proposals for names can be consolidated into two: > > 1. "mV [any complete syntagm]" where V is bindable. E.g. "la ma xrxe > pndaka'a" (Xrxe is friend to me) > > 2. word-initial q- marks the start of an onomastic stem that ends at the > next q > > I'll withdraw the proposal for single-segment names. Quantifier dV is not > needed. OK, I will add those to the grammar. I had come to the same conclusion that mV makes dV unnecessary. BTW, the "empty string" qq is included in 2, yes? mu'o mi'e xorxes