[YG Conlang Archives] > [engelang group] > messages [Date Index] [Thread Index] >
On Tue, Aug 28, 2012 at 7:14 PM, Mike S. <maikxlx@gmail.com> wrote: > > In the above, trying to reduce a Xorban expression using experimental > double binding, I carelessly left two "lu" binders that that I should have > removed. The expression should be: > > la liku ja je "/O/"i "/o/"u je "/E/"i "/e/"u frcikuka > > The original was: > > la ja li "/O/"i lu "/o/"u frcikuka li "/E/"i lu "/e/"u frcikuka > > Which better shows the difference, which could be much bigger if frcikuka > were replaced with a complex formula. Interesting. lake ptfake tvlake is this a way to deal with donkey-sentences: rake je frmra je xsle je pnsake drxake Every (a,e) farmer(a) & donkey(e) & owns(a,e): beats(a,e) mu'o mi'e xorxes