[YG Conlang Archives] > [engelang group] > messages [Date Index] [Thread Index] >


[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

Re: [engelang] xorban compounds (was: Re: Engelang phonology chat



On Sun, Aug 26, 2012 at 9:45 PM, And Rosta <and.rosta@hidden.email> wrote:
>
> Mike S., On 25/08/2012 23:41:
> > What about a compromise?
>
> Would {ifi} work as a(n optional) hyphen? Or any {VfV} where the vowels
> are the same? I may be wrong, but it seems to me that currently {ifi}
> following a predicate stem is not going to have a valid meaning.

If fsna menas "a happens", then "li smi fsnifi" would have to mean
something like "things happen as they happen", or "things happen in
the event in which they happen". Even if you say that the event that
happens and the event of it happening are necessarily different
things, it doesn't seem to be something that the grammar should
impose.

mu'o mi'e xorxes