[YG Conlang Archives] > [engelang group] > messages [Date Index] [Thread Index] >


[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

Re: [engelang] Re: Engelangs - A Design Goal Catalog



I've been following this and the discussion of logicality with 
interest. Scungric has two versions currently in more-or-less 
parallel development, one an outright artlang that is based 
largely on the more interesting bits I've gleaned from various 
natlangs and conlangs; the other, Scungric-Prime, is going to 
be a more engelangy process, with the ultimate goal of eventually 
merging the most interesting/useful parts of the two.

At present, Scungric-Prime is envisioned as having a basic 
head-first, head-marking structure, probably relatively high 
on the agglutinative/synthetic/polysynthetic scale with a large 
number of productive derivational processes, including apophonic 
changes to the stem (more like Semitic binyanim than like Germanic 
ablaut).

That said, the order of design goals for Scungric-Prime previously 
proposed by And and Mike is roughly as follows:

FLEXIBILITY. I'm thinking more of semantic flexibility, than 
    syntactic, as Scungric-Prime will likely be relatively rigid 
    in word-order, allowing fronting/raising of focussed phrases.
CONCISION. I may be wrong here, but it is my impression that one 
   can either have concision or simplicity, but not necessarily 
   both - given the choice, I'll spring for concision.
SYNTACTIC NON-AMBIGUITY. Provisionally clausal and phrasal markers 
   will serve to mark verb complements, relative clauses, etc.
SEMANTIC PRECISION. 
ICONICITY. Using a quasi-Semitic model of lexical stems should 
   assist in introducing a level of iconicity for semantically-
   related lexical items. 
PARSABILITY. 
COMPENDIOUSNESS. 
AESTHETICS. More in the phonology and in the morphological structure 
   than in the overall syntax/grammar.
LEARNABILITY. 
REGULARITY. As And said, this is relatively easy to achieve in 
   a conlang, so is relatively low on the scale, though it will 
   be a consideration.
REDUNDANCY.
LOGICALITY. My background in logic is spotty at best, so this is 
   not really a very important goal for me at present.
NATURALNESS. 
LOCAL/FORMAL SIMPLICITY.
GLOBAL/FUNCTIONAL SIMPLICITY.

-----
The order of these may shift as work progresses, but this is my 
initial list of preferred characteristics.

Bfowol